Sacral [or lumbosacral agenesis in severe cases where lumbar spine is also involved] characterized by absence of the variable portion of the caudal portion of the spine. It is a very rare deformity.
Patients with this deformity lack motor function at the affected vertebral level and sensory functions below the affected level.
It is also known as
- Caudal dysplasia
- Caudal dysplasia sequence
- Caudal regression syndrome
- Sacral regression
- Lumbo sacral agenesis
Renshaw classification divides the condition into four groups depending on amount of sacrum remaining and the characteristics of the articulation between the spine and the pelvis
Type I – Partial or total unilateral sacral agenesis
Type II – Partial sacral agenesis with a bilaterally symmetrical defect, a normal or hypoplastic sacral vertebra, and a stable articulation between the ilia and the first sacral vertebra.
Type III – Variable lumbar and total sacral agenesis, with the ilia articulating with the sides of the lowest vertebra present.
Type IV – Variable lumbar and total sacral agenesis, with the caudal endplate of the lowest vertebra resting above either fused ilia or an iliac amphiarthrosis.
Type II defects are most common, and type I are least common. Types I and II usually have a stable vertebral-pelvic articulation, whereas types III and IV produce instability and possibly a progressive kyphosis.
Etiology of Sacral Agenesis
The exact etiology of sacral agenesis is unknown.Maternal diabetes is the risk factor. Exposure to organic solvents in early pregnancy may increase the incidence.
Renshaw postulated that the condition is teratogenically induced or is a spontaneous genetic mutation that predisposes to or causes failure of embryonic induction of the caudal notochord sheath and ventral spinal cord. The dorsal ganglia and the dorsal portion of the spinal cord continue to develop. The dorsal ganglia and the dorsal portion of the spinal cord have been derived from the neural crest tissue and thus the sensory deficit is distal to the motor level.
Clinical Features of Sacral Agenesis
The clinical appearance of sacral agenesis patient ranges from one of severe deformities of the pelvis and lower extremities to no deformity at all.
Patients with with partial sacral or coccygeal agenesis may have no symptoms.
The posture of the lower extremities has been compared with a Sitting Buddha (see image below).
Anomalies in the genitourinary system and the rectal area, are common.
Examination of the back reveals a bone prominence representing the last vertebral segment and may reveal gross motion between this vertebral prominence and the pelvis. Flexion and extension may be found to occur at the junction of the spine and pelvis rather than at the hips.
Neurological examination usually reveals intact motor power down to the level of the lowest vertebral body that has pedicles. Sensation, however, is present down to more distal levels. Bladder and bowel control often is impaired.
Presentation depending on the severity is considered as follows
The vertebropelvic articulation is usually stable. The unilateral absence of the sacrum results in an oblique lumbosacral joint and a non progressive lumbar scoliosis. A calcaneovarus deformity of the foot may be present. Sensory loss corresponding to involved sacral roots may be present.
The vertebropelvic junction is stable if associated myelomeningocele is not present. Progressive scoliosis from associated congenital anomalies of the spinemay ocur.
Motor paralysis is present and sensation usually is normal. Anesthesia may be present at S4 level or distal. Motor and sensory loss is higher in patients 2ith associated myelomeningocele.
Unilateral or bilateral hip dislocation can occur in this type. Most patients are ambulatory.
The buttocks are flattened, the cleft is shortened, and each buttock is dimpled lateral to the cleft. The normal convexity of the sacrococcygeal region is lost. Hip dislocation, knee contracture, and foot deformity are common. This group of patients is not able to walk or stand without support
There is a complete absence of the lumbar spine and sacrum. Patients are of short stature with loss of normal convexity of sacrococcygeal joint and there is disproportion in thorax and pelvis.
The pelvis is very unstable and tends to roll up under the thorax and drop forward.
Severe kyphosis and scoliosis are common and require surgical treatment for stabilization. These patients have no bladder or bowel control and show almost all associated deformities as mentioned before.
This group of patients require spinal-pelvic stabilization or extensive orthotic support to ambulate.
Treatment of Sacral Agenesis
Type I and II patients [partial or complete absence of the sacrum] have an excellent chance of becoming community ambulators. Foot and knee deformities in these patients should be corrected.
Management of types III and IV type deformities is more controversial.
The treatment of spinal-pelvic instability is controversial. The patient with spine-pelvic instability is unable to sit without support or to ambulate without the aid of a pelvic-thoracic bucket. spinal-pelvic fusion can help these patients but does not seem justified for asymptomatic spinal-pelvic instability. If progressive deformity is present, lumbopelvic arthrodesis [Fusion of lumbar spine with pelvis] is recommended.
Reconstruction of the lower limb in type IV sacral agenesis has not been successful, because of the absence of muscle fibers and major motor nerves. Bilateral subtrochanteric amputation followed by fitting of a pelvic-thoracic bucket and a hip disarticulation prosthesis can provide partial ambulation.
Soft-tissue releases, supracondylar femoral extension osteotomies, and serial casting or amputation may be chosen for limb deformites.
Classification images adapted from Renshaw TS: Sacral agenesis: a classification in review of 23 cases, J Bone Joint Surg 60A:373, 1978
Clinical photograph from of Sacral Agenesis Phillips WA, Cooperman DR, Lindquist TC, et al: Orthopaedic management of lumbosacral agenesis: long-term follow-up, J Bone Joint Surg 64A:1282, 1982.
Get more stuff on Musculoskeltal Health
Subscribe to our Newsletter and get latest publications on Musculoskeletal Health your email inbox.
Thank you for subscribing.