Spine

Atlantoaxial instability implies excessive movement between the first cervical vertebra or atlas, and second cervical vertebra or axis.

Atlantoaxial joint is formed between these two vertebrae This joint is a kind of transition zone and the instability may occur because of bony or ligamentous instability.

The instability can be asymptomatic or cause neck pain and neural symptoms when spinal cord or nerve roots are involved.

Trauma, and degenerative changes in rheumatoid arthritis, and to some extent infection are major causes of this instability in adults.

Multiple congenital and genetic causes [see below] including Down syndrome and osteogenesis imperfecta are also associated with increased risk.

There is no preponderance for any age group and there is no racial predilection.

Pathophysiology

[See anatomy of cervical spine]

The integrity of the atlantoaxial joint is maintained by transverse apical alar ligament complex formed by

• The transverse ligament is the most important stabilizer
• Apical ligament
• Paired alar ligaments [parasagittal]

The transverse ligament acts as the primary restraint against anterior translation of the C1 on C2. The odontoid is the primary restraint against posterior translation.

The following three patterns of atlantoaxial instability are noted

• Flexion-extension
• Distraction
• Rotation

The instability is caused by bony or soft tissue changes in odontoid or tansverse ligament.

Odontoid changes could be due to

• Abnormal development of ossification
• Ossification of the odontoid
• Fracture of C1 or C2
• Destruction by tumor

The transverse ligament may undergo changes because of

• Ligamentous laxity due to abnormal protein [Down syndrome]
• Inflammation of the ligament [rheumatoid arthritis]

An abnormality or trauma can also be responsible for instability in C1-C2 joint.

Neural symptoms result when

• Subluxation or dislocation causes cord compression
  • by the odontoid process or
  • posterior arch of the atlas.
• Motion of the C1-2 segment can cause compression of nerve roots.

Vertical displacement of the atlas requires widening of the C1-2 facet joint which may be caused by breakage of the alar ligament, cruciate ligament, the tectorial membrane, or a combination.

Rheumatoid inflammation can destroy cartilage causing weakness of the transverse and alar ligaments and facet capsule. Movement at C1-C2 attenuates them further contributing to the instability.

Grisel syndrome refers to the atlantoaxial subluxation following inflammation of adjacent soft tissues after a pharyngeal infection or surgical intervention. It is primarily seen in children aged 5-12 years. A steeper dens-facet angle and rich vascularity in children makes them more susceptible.

In individuals with Down syndrome, the primary cause of AAI is the laxity of the transverse ligament.

It is rare to see atlantoaxial instability without a predisposing factor. Different conditions have different risks associated. Some known examples are

• Down syndrome – 13-15%
• Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia – 40%
• Morquio syndrome – Almost 100%
• Chondrodysplasia punctata – About40-50%
• Metatropic dysplasia – 75%

Causes of Atlantoaxial Instability

The following conditions can be associated with AAI:

• Down syndrome
• Congenital scoliosis
• Osteogenesis imperfecta
• Neurofibromatosis
• Morquio syndrome
• Larsen syndrome
• Dysplasia/Aplasia/Hypoplasia
  • Spondyloepiphysea congenita
  • Chondrodysplasia punctata
  • Metatropic dysplasia
  • Kniest syndrome
  • Achondroplasia
  • Pseudoachondroplasia
  • Cartilage-hair hyperplasia
• Abnormalities upper cervical spine
  • Os odontoideum
  • Ossiculum terminale
  • Hypoplasia or absence of the dens
  • Third condyle
• Rheumatoid arthritis
• Ankylosing spondylitis
• Infections
• Tumors
• Trauma

• • Type I odontoid fracture (very rare)
  • Atlas fractures
  • Transverse ligament injuries

• Cerebral palsy
• Steroid treatment
• Idiopathic laxity of the transverse ligament.

The causes vary with age group.

Common nontraumatic causes in adults are Down’s syndrome, rheumatoid Arthritis, os odontoideum whereas juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and Morquio syndrome are common in children.

Trauma or infection in children can lead to rotatory atlantoaxial subluxation.

Spinal cord compression can arise or worsen if susceptible spines are subjected to extreme ranges of motion. The complications include.

• Spasticity
• Myelopathy
• Neck pain
• Radicular symptoms

Classification [Fielding and Hawkins]

Type I

Simple rotatory displacement with an intact transverse ligament

Type II

• Anterior displacement of C1 on C2 of 3-5 mm
• One lateral mass serving as a pivot point
• Deficiency of the transverse ligament

Type III

Anterior displacement exceeding 5 mm

Type I

Posterior displacement of C1 on C2

Both type III and type IV are highly unstable.

Clinical Presentation

The patient could be asymptomatic in many cases.

Neck pain, heaviness and neural symptoms are the usual presenting symptoms.

Patients with congenital anomalies are usually without symptoms till the third decade of life as the spine is able to accommodate. With age, degenerative changes and rigidity causes increasing loads on atlantoaxial joint.

In individuals with rotatory displacement, torticollis can be the presenting symptom.

Symptomatic patients in rheumatoid arthritis with atlantoaxial instability can present with occipital pain.

Some patient may have myelopathy, vertigo, brainstem signs, or lower cranial nerve palsies.

The cases with trauma and post-infection atlantoaxial instability [Grisel syndrome] would have a preceding history. Tenderness over the spinous process of the axis and displacement of spine of the axis in the direction of head tilt [head tilt] may be noted in cases of instability after infection.

In the case of congenital deformities or syndromes, the neck examination is warranted to look for asymptomatic cases. This is especially true in Down syndrome, spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia, Morquio syndrome, chondrodysplasia punctata, and metatropic dysplasia.

Physical examination should include a detailed neurologic examination including. Upper motor neuron signs could indicate symptomatic atlantoaxial instability.

Commonly seen signs are increased reflexes, weakness of the muscles, broad-based gait, decreased hand dexterity, loss of motor milestones and bladder problems.

Somatosensory evoked response may reveal information regarding neurologic involvement.

Persons with AAS due to inflammatory processes less frequently exhibit signs of root or cord involvement.

Lab Studies

No laboratory studies are relevant.

Children presenting with atlantoaxial instability should be screened for genetic conditions which may be associated.

Imaging

X-rays

Standard views include open-mouth odontoid and lateral cervical spine radiograph. For better accuracy, the lateral view can be done in flexion, extension and flexion position.

The measurements for the cervical spine are done.

Lateral mass spread

Lateral mass are connected by a ring of C1 and can only be displaced if there is a disruption of the ring or the transverse ligament is ruptured

Measurement is done on the open-mouth view

• The combined spread of lateral masses of C1-C2 should not be more than 6.9 mm
• If more, it indicates transverse ligament rupture
• If greater than 8.1 mm injury is unstable

Atlantoaxial distance

• On lateral x-ray
• Indicates instability if more 4-5 mm

Atlantodental Interval or Atlanto-dens interval (ADI)

It is the distance between the odontoid process and the posterior border of the anterior arch of the atlas. In children, the value is less than 4 mm in lateral view with a neck in a neutral position. Measurement should be made in both flexion and extension views.

In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, a value of more than 10mm indicates the need for surgery.

Posterior Atlanto-dens-interval [PADI] or Space-available-cord [SAC]

It is measured as the distance from the surface of dens to the anterior surface of the posterior arch of atlas.

In adults, less than 14 mm is associated with increased risk of neurologic injury and is an indication for surgery.

CT/MRI

CT is able to provide more information on stability.

Rotatory displacement are difficult to measure on plain x-rays and are better depicted by CT especially with image reformatting.

MRI provides better imaging of soft tissues and neural tissues.

Treatment of Atlantoaxial Instability

Unless symptoms of spinal cord compression occur, AAI requires no treatment.

Once symptoms arise, cervical spine stabilization is indicated until surgical stabilization is performed.

There are no pharmacologic interventions for atlantoaxial instability.

In persons with rotatory displacement, the time of presentation dictates the treatment. Most of these patients’ conditions resolve spontaneously, and additional care is not sought.

Acute subluxations [less than one week]  are treated with a soft collar and rest for a week. If the reduction does not occur,  halter traction with analgesics and muscle relaxants is warranted.

If still the reduction does not occur, halo brace is applied.

A rotatory displacement more than 1 month’s duration is put on halo traction for 3 weeks is tried. Surgery is indicated if the reduction does not occur and there is a fixed deformity.

Fielding and Hawkins classification can be used as a rough guide-

• Type I – Stable, treated in a collar
• Type II – Potentially unstable, individualize the treatment conservative or surgical
• Type III, IV- Unstable, requires surgical stabilization

• Atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) of greater than 8 mm with evidence of cord compression on dynamic flexion-extension view
• Posterior atlantodental (or atlanto-dens or atlas-dens) interval (ADI) of 14 mm or less
• More than 3.5 mm of subaxial subluxation
• Progressive neurologic deficit

The aim of the surgery is

• Protection of the spinal cord
• Stabilization of spine
• Decompression of neural tissue
• Correction of deformity
• Reduction of deformity

Pure ligamentous injuries usually do not heal themselves and require C1-C2 fusion.

In case a bony avulsion is seen with ligamentous injury trial of conservating treatment by halo brace can be given.

Options for fixation implant include

• Transarticular screws posteriorly
• Screw-rod constructs along the C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle
• Posterior sublaminar wiring
• Halifax clamp

Treatment decisions are also determined by specific conditions.

References

• Babic-Naglic D, Potocki K, Curkovic B. Clinical and radiological features of atlantoaxial joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Z Rheumatol. 1999 Aug. 58(4):196-200.
• Evaniew N, Yarascavitch B, Madden K, Ghert M, Drew B, Bhandari M, et al. Atlantoaxial instability in acute odontoid fractures is associated with nonunion and mortality. Spine J. 2015 May 1. 15 (5):910-7.
• Wasserman BR, Moskovich R, Razi AE. Rheumatoid arthritis of the cervical spine–clinical considerations. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2011. 69(2):136-48.
• Yamazaki M, Someya Y, Aramomi M, Masaki Y, Okawa A, Koda M. Infection-related atlantoaxial subluxation (Grisel syndrome) in an adult with Down syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Mar 1. 33 (5):E156-60.
• Ahmed R, Traynelis VC, Menezes AH. Fusions at the craniovertebral junction. Childs Nerv Syst. 2008 Oct. 24 (10):1209-24.

The term lower cervical spine injury refers to the Injury of the subaxial cervical spine or that is below axis. It includes injuries to C3-C7 vertebra and adjoining structures.

Lower cervical spine injuries are very common and are associated with substantial mortality and morbidity.

The cervical spine can get injured during motor vehicle accidents or falls.

In trauma patients, it should be assumed that there is an injury to the cervical spine unless ruled out. Therefore, the cervical spine is protected in a patient of trauma, beginning at the accident site, during extrication, examination and shifting the patient.

Cervical spine injury has been known to occur in as many as 4.5% cases of blunt trauma.

The cervical spine is a mobile region enabling mobility in various planes and during any trauma, the head can act as a significant lever arm on the cervical spine and creating a wide range of injury patterns.

These injuries, minor or major, can affect the spinal cord and nerve roots, and depending on the level of the spinal injury cause various motor and sensory dysfunctions.

The injuries to the subaxial spine have a bimodal age distribution.

High energy trauma such as motor vehicle accidents is responsible for injuries in age 15-25 years whereas falls are the most common cause for persons older than 65 years.

The relatively minor trauma is able to cause injury in the second group because the cervical spondylosis predisposes the cervical cord to injury by diminishing the space.

Anatomy, Biomechanics, and Pathophysiology

The cervical spine consists of seven vertebrae numbered C1-C7. C1 and C2 along with C2-C3 joint are considered upper cervical spine whereas below that is lower cervical spine.

[Read anatomy of the cervical spine in detail]

The subaxial cervical spine is seen as formed by two columns.

The anterior column consists of posterior longitudinal ligament and structures anterior to it [vertebral body and disc, anterior longitudinal ligament].

The posterior column includes

• Pedicles
• Laminae
• Facet joints
• Spinous processes
• Posterior ligament complexes
  • Ligamentum flavum
  • Interspinous ligaments
  • Supraspinous ligaments

Posterior column often fails in extreme flexion or distraction and is able to resist tension. Posterior column failure may be associated with concomitant injury to the anterior column.

The zygapophyseal or facet joints are oriented at 45º to the axial plane, allowing a sliding motion. The joint capsule is weakest posteriorly.

Spinal nerves exit at the vertebral level. There are a total of eight cervical nerve roots.

The first root leaves above the atlas and last [C8] exits between the seventh cervical vertebra and the first thoracic level.

The cervical spine can get injured by various mechanisms that lead to bony or ligamentous failure.

The position of the head and neck at the time of impact and the direction of force causing injury results in the different pattern of injury seen.

Key components in cervical spine injury are force/load transmission and kinematics (motion). Mostly, cervical spine injury occurs due to both components being present in different proportions.

One can consider an axial compressive load applied to a single cervical vertebra as a fundamentally pure example of load transmission. Force can be applied in different directions like shear, torsion, tension.

Kinematics refers to cervical vertebral motion. The lower cervical spine that permits motion through intervertebral discs and facet joints and is limited by the anterior longitudinal ligament and posterior ligamentous complex. It can be in a flexion-extension plane, axial rotation and lateral flexion.

Flexion-extension motion is greatest at the C4-C5 and C5-6 segments, averaging about 20 degrees. Axial rotation ranges from 2 to 7 degrees at each of the subaxial motion segments. Lateral flexion is 10 to 11 degrees per level in C2-5 and decreases caudally.

Cervical spine injury alters both load transmission and the kinematics of the cervical spine. The cervical spinal column is extremely vulnerable to injury.

Allen described the following three common mechanisms for spinal injury in a descriptive classification. The various mechanisms described are

•  Compression-flexion
• Distraction-flexion
• Compression-extension

 Motor-vehicle accidents, falls, and accidents resulting from recreational activities or sports are the leading causes of injuries to the lower cervical spine.  

Classification of Lower Cervical Spine Injury

In the past, Holdsworth, Allen, and Harris systems of classifications have been used but these had following drawbacks

• Based on the mechanism of injury only
• Neurological status not taken into consideration
• Could not guide the treatment

American Association of Neurological Surgeons now recommends the use of Subaxial Injury Classification (SLIC ) and the Cervical Spine Injury Severity Score (CSISS).

[Read more about Allen Classification of Cervical Injury]

SLIC is based on three categories—morphology, discoligamentous complex (DLC), and neurologic status> Each category has subpoints which are given a score. The final score is calculated by adding all the scores.

• No abnormality – 0
• Compression – 1
  • Burst  +1 = 2
• Distraction – 3
• Rotation/translation – 4

With respect to the DLC, points are assigned as follows:

• Intact – 0
• Indeterminate – 1
• Disrupted – 2

With respect to neurologic status, points are assigned as follows:

• Intact – 0
• Root injury – 1
• Complete cord injury – 2
• Incomplete cord injury – 3
• Continuous cord compression in setting of neurologic deficit – +1

The score is used in decision making for treatment

• < 4 Nonoperative treatment
• 4 Operative versus nonoperative
• 5or more –  Operative treatment

Clinical Presentation

The cervical spine injury should be suspected in every major trauma.

For best possible in any given injury, the precautions of cervical spine begin at the field or first contact and continue till the spine is managed definitely.

The neck needs to be immobilized manually, with sandbags or cervical collar. These methods and use of spine board help to prevent secondary injury. Transfers and intubation should be accomplished under strict spine precautions. Log-roll technique and spinal precautions should be observed at all times.

Airway, breathing, and circulation should always be the highest priority.

Airway security and hemodynamic resuscitation are crucial and should take precedence. Tracheal intubation and central line placement are often performed in the emergency and due to a danger of worsening of injury by manipulation, manual cervical stabilization should be maintained throughout the intubation process.

If intubation is not possible, mask ventilation can be continued until fiberoptic or nasotracheal intubation can be safely performed in a hospital.

Cricothyroidotomy might be the safest alternative for airway control when the spine is highly unstable.

History should be taken to note the circumstances of accident and forces working. Mental status and consciousness level should be assessed.

Neurological functions, regions of pain and other injuries should be noted especially abrasions and/or laceration on the scalp, face, neck, or shoulders as clues to the mechanism of injury.

The back of the neck should be palpated for any tenderness, step-off, or hematoma.

Performa neurologic examination as soon as feasible as per ASIA.

The presence of pathologic reflexes like clonus Hoffman sign, and Babinski sign.

Often, in cases of acute cord injury, there is a spinal shock present and detailed assessment could only be done at a later date when spinal shock goes. The return of the spinal function is indicated by bulbocavernous reflex. Therefore serial examination needs to be done to see if spinal shock has gone or not. It usually takes about 24 hours.

[Read more about spinal shock]

[Read more about spinal cord injury]

Depending on the spinal cord injury, different incomplete patterns of spinal injury may be seen.

[Bilateral facet dislocations have the highest incidence of spinal cord injury often resulting in incomplete/complete injury paterns]

Special attention should be paid to examine sacral roots and reflexes. Return of sacral reflexes indicates the end of the spinal shock.

Secondly, the return of the sacral reflexes indicates the passing of spinal shock. The bulbocavernosus reflex and anal wink are good tests of the sacral reflex arc.

The neurological examination should be regularly done to find if the lesion is improving or worsening. This helps in the guidance of the treatment.

The neurogenic shock when present should be recognized and managed.

Lab Studies

In the initial acute stage hemoglobin level and typing/cross matching are required in case the patient requires a blood transfusion.

During acute management, the lab tests are done as the need arises during management.

After the patient is stabilized, routine lab studies are indicated which include

• Complete blood count
• Urine analysis,
• Biochemistry tests of blood
• Serum electrolyte levels
• Liver and renal function testing

Imaging

X-rays and CT

The standard x-ray imaging is a cross-table lateral view of the cervical spine that helps to gauge the cervical alignment. Other x-rays that could be included are odontoid view, and AP view.

A swimmer’s view may be needed to complete the evaluation.

In case, the x-rays are not able to visualize the spine properly, CT must be done to exclude the neck injury.

CT scan is helpful in imaging of the cervicothoracic junction and identification of posterior-column injuries such as lamina or facet fractures.

American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) recommendations

Awake, Asymptomatic Patient

No radiographic evaluation not required if the patient has no neck pain or tenderness, has no neural deficit and is able to complete a functional range of motion.

However, the patient should not have an injury that detracts from accurate evaluation.

Awake, Symptomatic Patient

High-quality computed tomography (CT) imaging of the cervical spine is recommended.

If high-quality CT imaging is not available, a 3-view cervical spine series (anteroposterior, lateral, and odontoid views) is recommended. This should be supplemented with CT =when it becomes available.

Obtunded or unevaluable Patient  

High-quality CT is indicated and if not available, 3 view cervical series is recommended and supplemented as CT becomes available.

MRI

MRI is able to visualize neural elements – cord and roots. Disc herniations can easily be seen on MRI.

A mismatch of injury levels on X-rays is another indication of MRI.

MRI should be performed in neurally intact patients of facet dislocations before closed reduction is done. The MRI is able to tell if there is any large disc herniation associated which could increase the risk of neural injury.

However, in a patient with injuries that require early surgical stabilization in the operating room, the reduction could be performed without the delay and therefore, MRI is avoided.

In the case of suspected vertebral artery injury, magnetic resonance angiography may be indicated. The artery is known to get injured in the severely degenerative cervical spine or fractures through the foramina transversarium.

Management of Cervical Injuries

Acute Management

Management of cervical injury in the emergency requires treating the multiple injuries [often associated] and treating the concomitant neurologic injury.

Though the risk-benefit ratio has been questioned, steroids are given to prevent secondary cord damage and to minimize local edema.

For a patient presenting within 3 hours of injury, the dosage is

• 30 mg/kg loading dose of methylprednisolone given intravenously (IV) over 1 hour, followed by 5.4 mg/kg/hr for the next 23 hours.

If the patient presents after 3 hours but less than 8 hours

• the 5.4 mg/kg/hr dosage is extended for 48 hours following the same loading dose.

After 8 hours of injury starting patient on steroid does not appear to be beneficial.

Steroids are associated with poor wound healing, the risk of infection, stress ulcers and increased sugar levels. Therefore some clinicians avoid the use of steroids. Moreover, there appears insufficient to weak evidence for their effectivity.

Histamine 2 (H2) blockers such as famotidine and ranitidine) are given to prevent stress ulcers from spinal cord injury.

Prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis is carried using low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), oral warfarin.

Intermittent compression devices for the lower extremities or vena cava filters may be used when required in high-risk cases

Approach to Definitive Treatment

After the patient is stabilized, the decision for the definitive treatment is based on

• Malalignment of the spine, with or without neural deficits
• Progressive neurologic deterioration associated with persistent compression.

Patients without malignment or without neural deficits [minimally displaced injuries] can be managed with nonoperative treatment.

Malalignment can be managed initially with cervical tong traction. Surgery is then done as definitive treatment. Decompression, when required, may be done.

In cases where the closed reduction is contemplated before the definitive treatment, the presence of concomitant disc herniations must be considered and if feasible confirmed with MRI. The discs with postero-inferior herniations are known to pose worsening of the neural deficit. [This is also important if the open reduction is planned.]

If MRI is not feasible, a cautious reduction while performing serial neurologic examination should be done in the awake patient.

But if the patient is intoxicated or has a head injury, MRI should be sought if patient condition allows.

A disc herniation if present should be removed anteriorly before performing the reduction.

The decision for surgery depends on the type of injury.

• For anterior column injuries
  • Anterior approach
  • Anterior decompression and reconstruction+grafting+ stabilization
• Posterior column injuries
  • Posterior approach
  • Posterior decompression/fixation/grafting
• Global injuries
  • Anterior and posterior fixation approaches

Early intervention [within 24-72 hours] is recommended to facilitate early decompression and rapid return of the mobilization.

Nonoperative Treatment Options

A number of lower cervical spine fractures can be managed with nonoperative means. Nonoperative means of treatment include orthoses, skull traction, and halo vest immobilization.

The basic aim of nonoperative means is to align and immobilize the cervical spine and prevent it from further stress till the fracture union occurs.

Orthoses

Orthoses can be cervical or cervicothoracic.

Orthoses decrease motion rather than effect true immobilization.

Cervical Orthoses work through padded contact areas strategically located over subcutaneous bony prominences like occiput, spinous processes, scapular spines, acromion processes, clavicles, sternum, and mandible.

Soft cervical orthoses cause little decrease in spinal motion and are most commonly used after cervical strains or sprains.

Rigid cervical orthoses can provide varying degrees of immobilization depending on the construction material and the overall design. They are commonly used for emergent in-field cervical spine immobilization.

Skin breakdown at bony prominences can occur as a complication of cervical collars.

Cervicothoracic Orthoses devices extend to the upper thorax. These provide more effective immobilization than simple cervical collars in all planes. Sternooccipito-mandibular immobilizer –(SOMI) and Minerva brace are examples of cervicothoracic orthoses.

However, they are more difficult to apply and remove and produce high resting pressures on the chin and occiput.

Both cervical and cervicothoracic devices cause increased motion at the cervicothoracic junction.

[Read more about cervical orthoses]

Cervical Traction

Traction can be used for temporary immobilization of unstable cervical spine injuries, or to realign or reduce and maintain cervical spine fractures or dislocations.  The devices used are Crutchfield’s tongs, Gardner-Wells tongs, and the halo-ring.

Halo Vest

Halo immobilization has become a less popular form of treatment for lower cervical spine injuries as the better internal fixation techniques have been developed. Despite this, halo vest immobilization remains a viable, minimally invasive method of stabilization of unstable cervical spine injuries for patients who might otherwise have contraindications to open surgical methods.

Surgical Treatment Options

With the increased choice of implants and gadgets and development of better surgical approaches & techniques, surgery is playing a greater role in the management of cervical injuries as compared to earlier times.

Anterior Surgery

The subaxial spine is reached by the interval plane between the sternocleidomastoid (lateral) and medial muscles. Following options are available with the anterior approach

• Decompression by removing offending structure
  • Removal of the disc [discectomy]
  • Removal of vertebra[corpectomy or vertebrectomy]
• Anterior Reduction of Dislocated Facets
  • Reduction confirmed under C-arm
  • Additional posterior surgery if reduction fails
• Reconstruction
  • Replacement of the removed vertebra or disc.
  • Autograft/ allograft/ titanium mesh cage.
• Stabilization
  • Anterior locking plate

Posterior Surgery

• Midline extensile posterior approach
• Decompression
  • Posterior decompression often not necessary
  • Laminectomy needed to remove the offending compressive elements.
• Open reduction of dislocated facet joints can be performed using a posterior approach.
• Posterior Instrumentation
  • Wire-based constructs
  • Variable-angle screw-rod constructs.
• Posterior Fusion
• Cancellous bone harvested from the posterior iliac crest

Follow-up after Surgical Treatment

Rigid postoperative external immobilization is often not required after surgery. A cervical collar is generally enough.

Postoperatively, patients usually are maintained in a rigid or soft collar for comfort.

The patient should be mobilized out of bed as soon as possible to prevent pulmonary and thromboembolic complications.

Further management of the injury is

• Wound care in early postoperative period
• Early mobilization
• Physical, emotional and functional rehabilitation
• Management of bowel and bladder dysfunction
  • Intermittent catheterizations
  • Alternate-day suppositories
  • High-fiber diet to avoid impaction.

Radiological sign of union is expected in about 2-3 months. Any deterioration in neurologic function should prompt further investigation.

Complications o Cervical Injury

• Spinal cord or root injury
• Pulmonary problems

• • Pneumonia
  • Atelectasis
  • Pulmonary embolus
• Stress ulcers
• Pressure ulcers
• DVT
• Depression
• Autonomic dysreflexia

Cervical Injuries in Special Cases

Patients with the ankylosed and spondylotic spine can suffer cervical injury even after minor trauma. Therefore, the patients who present with neck pain or neurologic deficit after major or minor trauma should be considered to have a cervical spine injury until proven otherwise.

Degenerative spondylotic changes, such as vertebral body osteophytes, fixed subluxations, and facet hypertrophy can make plain films difficult to interpret. Therefore unless the injury is severe, the plain x-rays may not be helpful in detecting a level of injury.

If x-rays do not reveal much information CT or MRI should be done in these patients.

Ankylosing Spondylitis and Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis

Due to ankylosis, the spine can no longer be considered as constituted of multiple motion segments. Instead, the ankylosed spine should be considered as a long bone.

Bridging osteophytes in these diseases fuse the spine into a solid, continuous piece of bone.  If there is a break in one region, it is likely to have propagated through both the anterior and posterior elements.

Therefore any fracture in the cervical spine in these patients should be considered as unstable and treated accordingly.

Patients should be immobilized as soon as the diagnosis is made, admitted, and placed on strict log-roll precautions until definitive management.

Halo fixation, anterior fixation, and posterior fixation are the treatment options in these patients through optimal treatment has not yet been formulated in the literature.

Spinal Cord Injury In  Spondylotic Spine

There is underlying cervical stenosis in these patients following the degenerative changes which increase the risk for neural injury.

Patients often present with complete or incomplete spinal cord injury without x-ray signs. CT or MRI as desired may be asked.

Again there is a shortage of data on what is optimal treatment.

Nonoperative Treatment includes rest, collar immobilization and observation in particular for patients with central cord lesions, in which a high percentage will have a nearly complete resolution of their neural deficits. The decision for long-term definitive treatment is influenced by the presence of persistent signs or symptoms or myelopathy.

Operative treatment is indicated in unstable spine or patients who do not recover with nonoperative treatment.

The treatment depends on cervical injury level and the presence or absence of myelopathy.

Prognosis

The clinical outcome after lower cervical spinal injury generally is related to the level and severity of associated spinal cord injury.

If the neural functions do not return, the patient is left with disabilities depending on the level of injury.

A rough estimate of different injury levels and functional disabilities is given below. The level given as cord levels.

[Read this article for correlation between cord levels and vertebral levels]

•  C3-4
  • must use a sip-and-puff (mouth)
  • Chin/head control for mobilization in a wheelchair
• C5
  • Able to assist with upper body dressing
  • Can feed themselves with assistive devices
  • Can operate a power wheelchair
• C6
  • Assistance with bowel and bladder programs
  • Able to feed themselves with hand or tenodesis splints
  • Can transfer to and from wheelchairs or toilets with some assistance
• C7
  • Can transfer independently to the bed, car, or toilet
  • Can use manual or power wheelchairs
  • Cand can dress independently using assistive devices
• C8
  • Independent in all transfers
  • Able to use a manual wheelchair
  • Can assist in some homemaking activities

[Read in detail about different levels of spinal cord injury]

References

1. Vaccaro AR, Hulbert RJ, Patel AA, Fisher C, Dvorak M, Lehman RA Jr, et al. The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: a novel approach to recognize the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complex. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Oct 1. 32 (21):2365-74.
2. Ryken TC, Hadley MN, Walters BC, Aarabi B, Dhall SS, Gelb DE, et al. Radiographic assessment. Neurosurgery. 2013 Mar. 72 Suppl 2:54-72
3. Toh E, Nomura T, Watanabe M, Mochida J. Surgical treatment for injuries of the middle and lower cervical spine. Int Orthop. 2006 Feb. 30(1):54-8.
4. Furlan JC, Noonan V, Cadotte DW, Fehlings MG. Timing of decompressive surgery of spinal cord after traumatic spinal cord injury: an evidence-based examination of pre-clinical and clinical studies. J Neurotrauma. 2011 Aug. 28(8):1371-99.

The Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification (SLIC) system is a classification system for subaxial cervical spine injury.

This is one of the recommended classification systems for lower cervical injury.

Not only it helps to determine the injury pattern and its severity but also it guides the treatment considerations and prognosis.

The classification is similar to TLICS for the thoracic and lumbar spine injuries.

The classification was given by Spine Trauma Study Group [Vaccaro et al, 2007] and is based on the following three characteristics.

• Injury Morphology
• Status of discoligamentous complex
• Neurological Status

Under each characteristic, points are given in order of increasing severity as given below.

Each of the 3 main categories is identified as integrally important to injury classification was assigned a weighted score.

Categories of Injury Morphology

Morphology of sub-axial cervical spine trauma was divided into three main categories referenced to the relationship of the vertebral bodies with each other (anterior support structures):

• Compression
• Distraction
• Translation/rotation.

Classification into each of the three groups can be determined through traditional radiographic imaging studies such as plain X-ray, CT scan and MR images.

Compression

Injury appearances compatible with compression were defined as a visible loss of height through part of or an entire vertebral body, or disruption through an end-plate. This morphology includes

• Compression fractures
• Burst fractures
• Sagittal or coronal plane fractures of the vertebrae
• Tear-drop or flexion compression fractures primarily involving the vertebral body.
• Undisplaced minimally displaced lateral mass and/or facet fractures

Concomitant fractures of the posterior cervical elements may exist with axial loading is more evenly distributed between anterior and posterior support structures.

Distraction

These injuries occur less commonly than compression injuries but signify degree disruption and potential instability.

The distraction injuries are primarily identified by evidence of anatomical dissociation in the vertical axis.

This injury pattern often involves ligamentous disruption propagating through the disk space or through the facet joints, such as that seen in facet subluxation or dislocation (without fracture and translation or rotation).

A hyperextension injury disrupting the anterior longitudinal ligament and widening the anterior disk space is another form of distraction injury.

An extension force may also result in concomitant compression injury to posterior elements or cord compression due to inward buckling of the ligamentum flavum.

MRI may detect subtle distraction injuries.

Facet capsules and bony anatomy of the facet joints are likely the primary posterior determinants of stability and must be considered for distraction injury evaluation.

Translation/Rotation

These injuries are based on radiographic evidence of horizontal displacement of one part of the sub-axial cervical spine with respect to the other exceeding physiological ranges.

This may be evidenced on either static or dynamic imaging.

A suggested threshold of rotation is a relative angulation of 11 degrees or greater.

Translation injuries are

• Facet fracture-dislocations [unilateral, bilateral]
• Fracture separation of the lateral mass (floating lateral mass)
• and bilateral pedicle fractures.

Translational and rotational injuries imply disruption to both anterior and posterior structures as demonstrated in several studies

Disco-ligamentous Complex

The discoligamentous complex includes the following structures

• Intervertebral disc
• Anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments
• Ligamentum flavum
• Interspinous and supraspinous ligaments
• Facet capsules

Facet joint capsules are the strongest component of the posterior tension band while the anterior longitudinal ligament is the strongest anterior ligamentous structure

The complex provides significant restraint for the spine against deforming forces while allowing movement under normal physiological loads.  If its integrity is broken, spinal instability occurs.

Instability and deformity can lead to long-term impairment, including paralysis.

Disruption is inferred by abnormal bony relationships on imaging and includes

• Widened inter-space between two adjacent spinous processes
• Malalignment or dislocation of facet joints
• Subluxation of the vertebral bodies
• Abnormal widening of a disc space

Distraction and translational injuries are almost always associated with some degree of discoligamentous complex compromise.

Neurological Status

Neurological injury is inherently an important indicator of the severity of spinal column injury. Significant neurologic injury infers a significant force of impact and potential instability to the cervical spine. Moreover, the neurological status may be the single most influential predictor of treatment.

Score Calculation

Morphology

The injury is scored depending on the visible morphology

• No abnormality is given a score of Zero – 0
• Compression – 2
• Distraction – 3
  • Perched facet
  • Hyperextension
• Rotation/translation – 4
  • Facet dislocation
  • Unstable teardrop fracture
  • Advanced-stage flexion compression injury

Thus, the minimum possible score is zero and the maximum 4 under these characteristics.

Discoligamentous Complex

• Intact – 0
• Indeterminate – 1
  • Isolated interspinous widening
  • MRI signal indicating injury
• Disrupted – 2
  • Widening of disk space
  • Perched facet joint
  • Facet dislocation

Neurological Status

• Intact- 0
• Root injury – 1
• Complete cord injury – 2
• Incomplete cord injury – 3
• Continuous cord compression in the setting of the neural deficit (Neuro Modifier)

In this category score of 1 is added in case there is continuous cord compression in the setting of neurological deficit. This is called neuro modifier.

Final Score

The total score is calculated by adding scores from all the categories.

Interpretation and Treatment Guidance

• A score of less than 4 is suitable for nonoperative treatment
• If score is 4, the patient may be treated without or with surgery and other factors might influence treatment decision
• If score is 5 or more, operative treatment should be considered.

The system does not pay attention to the level of injury which can be important in determining prognosis or surgical approaches. This could be a drawback of the system.

References

• Vaccaro AR, Hulbert RJ, Patel AA, Fisher C, Dvorak M, Lehman RA Jr, et al. The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: a novel approach to recognize the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complex. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Oct 1. 32(21):2365-74.

** All the images used have been taken from the referenced article and labeled for easier grasp.